Monday, October 27, 2014

Science Fact or Cinematic Ficton?

In the world of movies, there is a certain limit one must follow the laws of physics for the audience to believe in the world the filmmakers are creating. However, there are plenty of movies where these laws of physics must be broken. Whether filmmakers do this due to ignorance of science or for good reason to advance the story depends. In the examples below, the law of action and reaction is discussed and judged on whether or not the breaking of the law is justified. In these films, the laws of action and reaction is sometimes broken through poor knowledge, and other times it is broken through good intentions of carrying a good story. The three films I have chosen are Cloud Atlas, Hook, and Kill Bill.
The first film I chose was Cloud Atlas, one of my favorite movies. One can describe the movie as the journey of several souls throughout the history of Earth, and it journeys through many different eras and has a multitude of characters. It is often harped on for its complicated plot, so I assumed the audiences would not pay too much attention to the laws of physics. I was somewhat correct in this assumption. While this film takes place throughout many fantastical worlds, the laws of physics are actually followed closely well for the majority of the film. Many laws are followed well, such as with the laws of balance while the future Neo-Korean characters, Hae-Joo and Sonmi, are running across a small beam over a harrowing sky-rise. However, they disregarded the law of action and reaction in a later scene, and it is debatable if this was done for the story or out of ignorance.
In the same timeline mentioned before, there is a fight scene that takes place between one of the male leads, Hae-Joo Chang, and the Neo-Seoul police. In this fight scene, there are several instances when the law of action and reaction is broken. These several instances noted are the inaccuracy of recoil of a gun. This is seen in the scene where Hae-Joo saves Sonmi from the police. He is disguised as a simple truck driver, but then pulls out his trusty futuristic energy type of gun. Hae-Joo fires this gun and the police officers go flying in the air, hitting the walls. This scene is also somewhat odd for several reasons. Firstly, in that the police officers fly away at a relatively slow speed. Secondly, Hae-Joo aims the gun at one officer, but the second one standing behind Hae-Joo also goes flying away. Not only is there a flaw with the speed at which the police officer is shot away and how the second one is also blown away, but Hae-Joo shows no effects of a recoil as well. If the gun Hae-Joo was firing was strong enough to blow away a human being, the speed would have to be incredibly strong. Secondly, if the gun was that powerful, Hae-Joo would have to suffer significant recoil as well. Maybe the future designed guns that have no recoil and can make people fly away without firing at them… however, it is still distracting from the audience. This scene was a instance where I believe the filmmakers disobeyed the law of action and reaction, but I do not believe it helped further the story in a significant enough of way for them to do so.
The next movie I will evaluate is Hook, Steven Spielberg’s children fantasy movie about a grown up Peter Pan. It is a children's fantasy movie, so it is understandable the filmmakers would break the laws in order to fulfill a child's dream. They break numerous laws, the most obvious being the law of gravity with Peter Pan and a number of other character’s ability to fly. Disregarding those laws, the filmmakers also decided to break the law of action and reaction. The instance in particular where the law of action/reaction is broken is when Jack is playing baseball in Neverland, where Captain Hook is hosting the game. Jack hits an unbelievably far home run. For a ten year old boy with little muscle mass, he would not be able to put such energy into hitting a baseball so far that it goes hundreds of feet into the air.
However, this is one of the instances where the breaking of the law of action and reaction is justified. It is the moment when Jack finally feels validated by a father figure, and the story would not have been able to progress without this feat of incredible strength. The filmmakers clearly knew they were doing the impossible, but they had to do it in order to fulfill the needs of the story.
The final movie I chose to analyze was Kill Bill by Quentin Tarantino. Honestly, I could have chosen any of Tarantino’s recent films, in most of his films, the blood spray is wildly inaccurate and this is a rather good example of breaking the law of action and reaction. However, Kill Bill had a slightly more intricate way in which they broke the law of action and reaction than the typical gun spraying blood all over the place. There is still blood involved in this example, as expected.
In the one of the many climaxing battle scenes in the movie, the Bride has to fight O-Ren's 88 army. There are countless instances where the law of action and reaction is broken. However, this example in particular is a twist from the norm. In this instance, the Bride is fighting the schoolgirl assassin Gogo. Gogo wields a large metal spiked ball. The Bride is finally able to defeat her when she kicks the spiked ball, has it bounce against a wooden beam, and then bounces back to hit Gogo's head. Firstly, there would not be enough energy to propel this metal ball enough times that it is able to make a significant damage to Gogo. Secondly, this energy would also not be significant enough that force makes Gogo break the table she is standing on in recoil. While the Bride is strong, she  does not have enough energy to propel a large metal ball, have it bounce back at a high speed, and have the table get destroyed in the recoil. However, I believe the filmmakers were well aware of the inaccuracy of this stunt. It made for an exciting action scene and had all the speed and blood that the story and feel of the movie needed.
In conclusion, in all of these movies, the law of action and reaction is broken and bent in unbelievable ways. However, the audience does not mind it so much. It is all to the benefit of the story and creating an immersive world the law is broken. That is good reason enough in a fantastical world of cinema.

Listed below are the Youtube links for the two of the scenes mentioned:
Cloud Atlas: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M1r3i4SSbMA (begins at 0:07)
Kill Bill: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x9iIKn1Bl6c (begins at 2:00)


Monday, October 20, 2014

Outline for the Second Term Paper

Science Fact or Cinematic Fiction?

I. Intro
    a. In the world of movies, there is a certain limit one must follow the laws of physics for the audience to believe in the world the filmmakers are creating. However, there are plenty of movies where these laws of physics must be broken, whether it be through ignorance of science or for good reason to advance the story. In the examples below, the law of action and reaction is discussed. In these films, the laws of action and reaction is sometimes broken through poor knowledge, and other times it is broken through good intentions of carrying a good story. The three films I have chosen are Cloud Atlas, Hook, and Kill Bill.

II. Body

   a. Cloud Atlas
        - While this film takes place throughout many fantastical worlds, the laws of physics are actually followed closely well for the majority of the film. However, in one of the future timelines, there is a fight scene that takes place between one of the male leads, Hae-Joo Chang, and the Neo-Seoul police. In this fight scene, there are several instances when the the law of reaction/action is broken. One notable example is when Chang is firing bullets at the police. The police go flying in the air, at a somewhat slow speed, hitting the wall and get knocked out. Chang shows no effects of a recoil.
 
b. Hook
       - Hook is a children's fantasy movie, so it is understandable the filmmakers break the laws to fulfill a child's dream. The instance in particular where the law of action/reaction is broken is when Jack is playing baseball in Neverland, where Captain Hook is hosting the game. Jack hits a unbelievably far home run. For a a ten year old boy with little muscle mass, he would not be able to put such energy into hitting a baseball so far that it goes hundreds of feet into the air.
 
c. Kill Bill
      - In the battle scene between the Bride and O-Ren's 88 army, there are countless instances where the law of action/reaction is broken. One of the many examples is seen when the Bride kicks the spiked ball back to the schoolgirl assassin Gogo, and then the ball bounces on a wooden beam and then bounces back to hit Gogo's head. There would not be enough energy to propel this metal ball so many times that it makes a significant damage to Gogo that she breaks a table in response.

III. Conclusion
     a. In all of these movies, the law of action/reaction is broken and bent in unbelievable ways. However, the audience does not mind it so much. It is all to the benefit of the story and creating an immersive world the law is broken. That is good reason enough in a fantastical world of cinema.

Tuesday, October 14, 2014

Reverse Video Reference

Here is my wonderful rendition of these fancy walks. Sorry I'm not so technologically fancy to figure how to embed this, so copy and paste yay!

Reference A
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=djMZYFzMpgI

Reference B
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0JXG4bmtWs4

Reference C
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HEtouIxQrc8

Reference D
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zO8uSGsa-9Y

Enjoy!


Tuesday, October 7, 2014

Stop Motion Animation of Falling

Here is something suprising... a ball bounce! Who would of guessed? Happy Sarcastic Awareness Month. That last part isn't sarcastic. It really is Sarcastic Awareness Month.


The process for this stop motion was fairly simple. I had leftover construction paper and decided to cut out two different shapes, a circle and an oval. Then I used a ruler in between shots to align the balls as was bouncing. I did a simple background as well with a ground plane. I played with the spacing according to the fourth down at half time, though I did manipulate this rule when the ball made contact with the floor.
Enjoy, Madeline